Construction Insurance: Exceeding the maximum covered amount may result in no coverage!
Published on :
06/08/2026
06
August
Aug
08
2026
In a ruling dated July 2, 2026, the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation reminded construction professionals of the importance of reviewing the exact limits and conditions of their insurance policy before accepting a project.
In this case, a project manager had been involved in the landscaping of an integrated development zone (ZAC). Following defects affecting the work, the project manager was held liable and ordered to compensate the project owner.
The professional then sought coverage from his insurer. However, his policy limited coverage to construction projects whose total cost did not exceed 15 million euros, unless the insurer had specifically granted coverage beyond that threshold. Yet the total cost of the project, however, far exceeded the limit set out in the policy.
The project manager argued that only the value of the work corresponding to his own scope of services should be taken into account. The Court of Cassation rejected this argument: the threshold set forth in the contract had to be assessed by reference to the total cost of the construction project and not solely based on the value of the works entrusted to the insured.
Since the contractual cost threshold had been exceeded without any additional coverage having been obtained, the professional was therefore not entitled to any reimbursement. The Court of Cassation clarified that this was not a case of a project being underinsured, but rather one that, because its cost exceeded the contractual threshold, fell outside the scope of the insurance coverage provided under the policy.
This decision serves as a crucial reminder: before accepting work on a large-scale project, construction professionals should verify the maximum project covered by their insurance policy, as well as the conditions that must be met to obtain an extended coverage.
Source: 2 juillet 2026, Cour de cassation, Pourvoi n°24-12.598
History
-
ATOUT RISK MANAGER
Published on : 22/10/2026 22 October Oct 10 2026Actualités
It was with great pleasure that we contributed to issue no. 49 of the magazin... -
Defective product: The manufacturer remains liable for a safety defect in its machine even if the victim has made unauthorised modifications to it – only the amount of compensation may be reduced
Published on : 02/10/2026 02 October Oct 10 2026Actualités
A farmer had bought a straw baler whose rear door was too narrow to allow h... -
Subcontracting: the project owner may be required to pay for additional works
Published on : 30/09/2026 30 September Sep 09 2026Actualités
In a judgement of 3 September 2026, the Court of Cassation reiterated the o... -
Inexcusable fault on the part of the employer: towards more comprehensive compensation for damages!
Published on : 16/09/2026 16 September Sep 09 2026Actualités
In a judgement of 3 September 2026, the Court of Cassation strengthened the r... -
Asbestos: The Burden of Proof for Benefits Deductible from Compensation Lies with FIVA
Published on : 19/08/2026 19 August Aug 08 2026Actualités
An employee died in 2019 from mesothelioma, a condition linked to asbestos ex... -
Construction Insurance: Exceeding the maximum covered amount may result in no coverage!
Published on : 06/08/2026 06 August Aug 08 2026Actualités
In a ruling dated July 2, 2026, the Third Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassa...