Latest news on key information regarding the limitation period for claims for anxiety-related damage
Published on :
20/07/2026
20
July
Jul
07
2026
On 29 May 2026, the Court of Cassation, sitting in a joint chamber, provided crucial guidance on the limitation period for claims relating to anxiety arising from potential physical injury.
In this case, a woman had been exposed to distilbene whilst in the womb. As an adult, the victim feared she might develop a serious medical condition.
She therefore sought compensation from the courts for her anxiety-related damage.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the victim’s claim, ruling that her action was time-barred under Article 2224 of the Civil Code. Indeed, in the absence of any manifest symptoms, the court held that the anxiety-related harm could not constitute personal injury.
The Court of Cassation points out that personal injury has a dual dimension: it may involve either physical or psychological harm to the individual. It is precisely this psychological aspect that encompasses anxiety-related harm: as anxiety is the consequence of a potential impairment to physical integrity resulting from exposure to the toxic substance, it must, according to the judges, be subject to the limitation period applicable to personal injury. Consequently, anxiety arising from potential bodily injury is subject to a ten-year limitation period.
Source : Cour de cassation, Chambre mixte, 29 mai 2026, 24-17.384, Publié au bulletin
History
-
Latest news on key information regarding the limitation period for claims for anxiety-related damage
Published on : 20/07/2026 20 July Jul 07 2026ActualitésOn 29 May 2026, the Court of Cassation, sitting in a joint chamber, provided...
-
Sookany Trophy 2026, Madagascar’s biggest regatta
Published on : 09/07/2026 09 July Jul 07 2026ActualitésWe are delighted to be among the Gold Sponsors of the Sookany Trophy 2026, Ma...
-
Can a construction damage insurer be held liable on the basis of general contractual liability?
Published on : 24/06/2026 24 June Jun 06 2026ActualitésA group of property owners alleged that their construction damage insurer had...
-
Can a purchaser who has been the victim of fraudulent misrepresentation be compensated without seeking to have the sale set aside?
Published on : 10/06/2026 10 June Jun 06 2026ActualitésA couple purchased a flat for €710,000. After the sale, they discovered that...
-
Do remedial works interrupt the ten-year limitation period?
Published on : 22/05/2026 22 May May 05 2026ActualitésA care home (EPHAD) had a residential block built, which was accepted in 2008...
-
The admission of a non-judicial expert opinion supported by accompanying documents not provided by the expert himself
Published on : 06/05/2026 06 May May 05 2026ActualitésAn insurer, having been subrogated to the rights of its insured after paying...




